Monday, May 30, 2016

The Probable Unintended Consequences Of Another Third Party Candidate

"Good Intentions" Is Not A Strategy

A Third Party, Presidential Candidate now being considered by establishment Republicans, some Evangelicals and Conservative Independents, is a desperate move to provide a Candidate who doesn't have the huge disapproval ratings, in the polls, as Trump, Clinton and Sanders. The last really big Third Party attempt we had was Perot against Bush #1 and Bill Clinton. Clinton won it with 43% of the popular vote due to the entry of Perot.

Popular vote in 1992 Presidential Race which got us Clinton.

Bill Clinton - 44,909,806 - 43.0% - Democrat

H.W. Bush - 39,104,550 -  37.4% - Republican

Ross Perot  - 19,743,821 - 18.9% - Independent

All other candidates combined only got 00.7%

In the Presidential Election of 1992, Third Party Conservative, Candidate Ross Perot, in his effort to keep the office from Socialist, Liberal Bill Clinton or Semi-Conservative H.W. Bush, unintentionally gave the Presidency to Bill Clinton by dividing the Republican, and Conservative Independent votes, between himself and Bush. Had he not run, almost all of those who voted for Perot, because he was more Conservative than Bush, would have voted for Bush not Clinton. Though I, personally, liked Perot's stand better than the first Bush, I voted for Bush to avoid Liberal Socialist Clinton winning. If Perot had not been in the race, Bush would have won more electoral votes, by far, with somewhere close to 55% of the popular vote, the Clinton machine would have died and we would not be facing Hillary, who is worse than her Bill, today.

As much as I dislike Donald Trump's narcissistic, in your face boasting, I would far rather have him than Hillary's habitual lying, Socialism and ineptness in everything she has ever been involved in .... or Bernie Sanders the flaming Socialist who may actually be a closet Communist. Trump would be much preferable to either of the Democrats.

What very well may happen is that Hillary will be charged with serious crimes and forced to drop out of the race, which would pit Bernie Sanders against Trump and the Third Party Conservative Candidate. I don't think the Democrats would split their party by choosing Biden over Sanders at their convention... but they may. They are, after all, the real Socialist Party in America, but won't admit it. In that scenario, both Trump and Sanders, who have high "negative" disapproval ratings in the polls, and the Third Party Candidate, would probably each get near a third of the popular vote.  In which case the big city states, with large Socialistic welfare populations and the most electoral votes as well, may just give us a self-confessed Socialist as President.  But, who knows, we may wind up with a three party system and someone other than a Democrat or Republican President.

Actually, there is already a Third Party Candidate other than the one I speak of above. It is the Libertarian Party Candidate, Gary Johnson, former Governor of New Mexico, who is involved in and a proponent of legalized Marijuana as well as, in general, live and let live, let everyone do whatever they choose to do, reduce the military, and stay out of foreign affairs. He already has 10% of the popular vote in two polls, but draws his support about equally between Democrat and Republican.

One thing is sure. "Hope" will not determine the outcome of the Presidential election ... Prayer may ... But why should God help us out of this mess when there seems to be no real repentance and turning to God in America? We may just get what we deserve .... which is frightening. The question is ... "Who is the most frightening?"

Sunday, May 29, 2016

Would This Human/Beast Be A Biblical Human, Animal, Or Something More Sinister?

Stranger by far than fiction ... where could it lead?
Using God created DNA to make a humanimal perversion ???

In Search For Cures, Scientists Create Embryos That Are Both Animal And Human
Heard on NPR All Things Considered 
By Bob Stein

A handful of scientists around the United States are trying to do something that some people find disturbing: make embryos that are part human, part animal.

The researchers hope these embryos, known as chimeras, could eventually help save the lives of people with a wide range of diseases.

One way would be to use chimera embryos to create better animal models to study how human diseases happen and how they progress.

Perhaps the boldest hope is to create farm animals that have human organs that could be transplanted into terminally ill patients.

But some scientists and bioethicists worry the creation of these interspecies embryos crosses the line. "You're getting into unsettling ground that I think is damaging to our sense of humanity," says Stuart Newman, a professor of cell biology and anatomy at the New York Medical College.

The experiments are so sensitive that the National Institutes of Health has imposed a moratorium on funding them while officials explore the ethical issues they raise.

Nevertheless, a small number of researchers are pursuing the work with alternative funding. They hope the results will persuade the NIH to lift the moratorium.

"We're not trying to make a chimera just because we want to see some kind of monstrous creature," says Pablo Ross, a reproductive biologist at the University of California, Davis. "We're doing this for a biomedical purpose."

The NIH is expected to announce soon how it plans to handle requests for funding.

Recently, Ross agreed to let me visit his lab for an unusual look at his research. During the visit, Ross demonstrated how he is trying to create a pancreas that theoretically could be transplanted into a patient with diabetes.

The first step involves using new gene-editing techniques to remove the gene that pig embryos need to make a pancreas.

Working under an elaborate microscope, Ross makes a small hole in the embryo's outer membrane with a laser. Next, he injects a molecule synthesized in the laboratory to home in on and delete the pancreas gene inside. (In separate experiments, he has done this to sheep embryos, too.)

After the embryos have had their DNA edited this way, Ross creates another hole in the membrane so he can inject human induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS for short, into the pig embryos.

Like human embryonic stem cells, iPS cells can turn into any kind of cell or tissue in the body. The researchers' hope is that the human stem cells will take advantage of the void in the embryo to start forming a human pancreas.

Because iPS cells can be made from any adult's skin cells, any organs they form would match the patient who needs the transplant, vastly reducing the risk that the body would reject the new organ.

But for the embryo to develop and produce an organ, Ross has to put the chimera embryos into the wombs of adult pigs. That involves a surgical procedure, which is performed in a large operating room across the street from Ross's lab.

Ross then rushed over with a special syringe filled with chimera embryos. He injected 25 embryos into each side of the animal's uterus. The procedure took about an hour. He repeated the process on a second pig.

Every time Ross does this, he then waits a few weeks to allow the embryos to develop to their 28th day — a time when primitive structures such as organs start to form.

Ross then retrieves the chimeric embryos to dissect them so he can see what the human stem cells are doing inside. He examines whether the human stem cells have started to form a pancreas, and whether they have begun making any other types of tissues.

The uncertainty is part of what makes the work so controversial. Ross and other scientists conducting these experiments can't know exactly where the human stem cells will go. Ross hopes they'll only grow a human pancreas. But they could go elsewhere, such as to the brain.

"If you have pigs with partly human brains you would have animals that might actually have consciousness like a human," Newman says. "It might have human-type needs. We don't really know."

That possibility raises new questions about the morality of using the animals for experimentation. Another concern is that the stem cells could form human sperm and human eggs in the chimeras.

"If a male chimeric pig mated with a female chimeric pig, the result could be a human fetus developing in the uterus of that female chimera," Newman says. Another possibility is the animals could give birth to some kind of part-human, part-pig creature.

"One of the concerns that a lot of people have is that there's something sacrosanct about what it means to be human expressed in our DNA," says Jason Robert, a bioethicist at Arizona State University. "And that by inserting that into other animals and giving those other animals potentially some of the capacities of humans that this could be a kind of violation — a kind of, maybe, even a playing God."

Ross defends what his work doesa. "I don't consider that we're playing God or even close to that," Ross says. "We're just trying to use the technologies that we have developed to improve peoples' life."

Still, Ross acknowledges the concerns. So he's moving very carefully, he says. For example, he's only letting the chimera embryos develop for 28 days. At that point, he removes the embryos and dissects them.

If he discovers the stem cells are going to the wrong places in the embryos, he says he can take steps to stop that from happening. In addition, he'd make sure adult chimeras are never allowed to mate, he says.

"We're very aware and sensitive to the ethical concerns," he says. "One of the reasons we're doing this research the way we're doing it is because we want to provide scientific information to inform those concerns."

Ross is working with Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte from the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., and Hiromitsu Nakauchi at Stanford University. Daniel Garry of the University of Minnesota and colleagues are conducting similar work. The research is funded in part by the Defense Department and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM).

Here are the Bible references to the 666 "Beast" in The Revelation...

11:7 - 13:1,4,17,18 - 14:3,11 - 15:2,7 - 16:2,10,13 -
17:3,7,8,11,12 - 18:13 - 19:4,19,20 - 20:4.10

Thursday, May 26, 2016

There Is Something Hillary Needs Worse Than The Presidency

She is a tormented woman and winning will not help her or us

Common Sense Commentary: There may not be another couple in America who have the ambitious, all in, irrepressible drive, for power, wealth, and recognition as these two old hippies, Hillary and Bill Clinton. Their entire lives, from youth, have run from one extreme, of hatred for American Free Enterprise, the Rich, the Military, and the Constitution to the other extreme, with age, morphing into the very things they hated. Today they using these very same objects of their original hatred to gain and keep power, control and wealth. In their transformation they have left a miles wide path of human and national wreckage, death, corruption and disgrace equal to a mammoth, amoral, Arkansas tornado. Lust may have destroyed Bill's soul, but power and bitter meanness has destroyed Hillary's and may finish off America. So what can America give Hillary instead of the Presidency?

This from Political Insider News

Doctor Just Exposed Hillary 

Hillary Clinton’s failing health has been speculated about for years. But now that she’s on the campaign trail, people are starting to ask major questions.

A Critical Care Nurse has written that there is plenty to question about the 68-year old Hillary Clinton. Something isn’t right .... her medical records are outdated and someone is covering up major problems.

Supposedly, she only suffers from blood clots, as Dr. Drew Pinsky reported:
"She’s had twice a clot in her leg – these are serious clots that lead to something called pulmonary embolism, which can also cause sudden death. So, she has an underlying recurrent blood clot in her leg, a clot in her transverse sinus…why is she clotting?” he asked Via Mad World

The problem here is, why is Hillary Clinton taking an “anticoagulant” (a blood thinner) called Coumadin for her clots from years ago… when there’s supposedly no underlying condition currently? It typically isn’t used for more than 2 months, which is a clear sign that something else is wrong.

Hillary has to be monitored closely, as the medicine insures she can bleed under the skin easily by bumping into things. A car accident could mean bleeding to death, as blood clots would not properly form.

As Dr. Drew noted:
“And then why would you leave her on the oldest and sort of most treacherous anticoagulant? If you’re going to leave somebody on an anticoagulant, why the oldest, old fashion anticoagulant … Wouldn’t you think somebody who’s a candidate for president (would) have one of the newer anticoagulants that are safer?” At that age, clots can lead to pulmonary embolism (clot traveling to the lungs)… which damages the lungs or other organs. It could also cause a stroke and kill.

Don’t forget even her closest advisor Huma Abedin has admitted on State Department emails that Hillary is sick and “often confused.” And Matt Drudge has noted Hillary Clinton’s possible use of a “walker” during magazine photo shoots.

Considering that being President is perhaps the most difficult job in the world, shouldn’t the American people know what type of health problems Hillary Clinton is hiding from us? There is a massive coverup going on about Hillary Clinton’s failing health, and that’s why doctors are noticing.
My Common Sense Comment is ...
What we, as Americans, need to do for Hillary Clinton is not to elect her as President but pray for her health, her mean bitterness, her husband and God's mercy for both of their eternal souls.  Yes, pray for Hillary's conversion. RB

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Before You Turn The Hen House Over To The Fox, Remember Her Record

And this is just the feathers and egg shells of her past.

When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform.  Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress.  This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration.  Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my worst mistake.”  Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.

Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission.  Lani Guanier was her selection.  When a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations.  She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department.  Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security.  When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House.  Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.

Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense.  Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle were:

She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit.  After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones she refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor.  After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs. Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practise law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.

After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.

Maybe worst of all was her dereliction of duty and responsibility in the deaths of our Ambassador and his protectors in Benghazi, as well as years of bad judgment, damaging decisions and our loss of global respect, while she was Secretary of State.

What a swell party – ready for another four or eight year of this type low-life mess? Now we are exposed to her destruction of incriminating emails and mishandling of national security information while she was Secretary of State. Not to mention the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation. You have to wonder what shoe will fall next.  But to her loyal fans - “what difference does it make?”

Electing Hillary Clinton president would be like granting Satan absolution and giving him the keys to heaven!

And just think, since leaving the White House, the Clinton's, through 2014, had made $221,139,576.00 and BOTH are now drawing huge taxpayer funded U. S. Government pensions, with superb medical care and 24 hour Secret Service protection for life.