The Voice Of Credibility: Billy Graham's Son Franklin On Obama's Refusal To Say "Islamic Terrorism"

Franklin Graham calls out Obama on 'Islamic terrorism'

By BOB UNRUH In World Net Daily

One of America’s most prominent faith leaders is calling out President Obama for refusing to recognize and acknowledge the threat from Islamic radicalism and terrorism.

In a Facebook post Monday, Franklin Graham, the chief of Samaritan’s Purse, pointed out that Obama, during his statements about the weekend’s massacre by a radical Islamic terrorist at a bar for homosexuals, refused to call it an act of radical Islamic terrorism.

Obama throughout his presidency has refused to say the words Islamic terrorism or radical Islamic terrorism. Often, he’s suggested that Islam actually is peaceful and those who carry out violence and terror against innocent victims in the name of Islam actually are wrong about Islam.

Graham, however, said it’s apparent that’s not really right, and Obama needs to recognize that.

“I appreciate President Barack Obama speaking to the nation yesterday in the wake of the Orlando massacre. He was right in saying that this tragic shooting was an act of terror and hate,” Graham wrote.

“But why didn’t he say it was an act of radical Islamic terrorism?”

“Mr. President, with all due respect, don’t forget Fort Hood; don’t forget the Boston Marathon; don’t forget San Bernardino; and don’t forget 9/11. What do they all have in common? They were all Islamic terrorists carrying out their treachery in the name of their religion.”

Graham continued, “Mr. President, your administration has cut our military to the bone, and some experts say we’re the weakest we have been in modern times. It’s time we were rebuilding our military force worldwide to take on this enemy. It’s time we tighten America’s borders until we can clearly vet those we’re letting into the country.

“Mr. President, how many more American lives have to be lost before you understand the threat radical Islam is to every freedom-loving person?”

Obama called the attack by Omar Mateen, who in dialogue with police during the attack openly pledged his support to ISIS, the Middle East Islamic terror horde that has been blamed for the deaths of thousands through horrific execution methods including drowning in a cage, tying explosives around victims’ necks and exploding them, beheadings, crucifixions and even burying victims alive, “terror and an act of hate.”

Obama claimed to want to “spare no effort to determine” Mateen’s “inspiration.”

Then Obama turned political, talking about gun control, and whether the U.S. wants to be a country where it is “easy” … “for someone to get their hands on a weapon that lets them shoot people in a school, or in a house of worship, or a movie theater, or in a nightclub.”

The shooting happened at the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and as of early Monday, 49 were confirmed dead. Many others remained hospitalized, some in critical conditions.

Mateen, 29, reportedly drove several hours from his home in Port St. Lucie, Florida, to the “gay” bar early Sunday and, armed with a rifle and a handgun, shot more than 100.

SWAT team members eventually stormed the building, and Mateen was killed.

ISIS had called for Muslims in America to attack and kill people during Islam’s current month of Ramadan, an event Obama celebrates every year in the White House.

The Great Harlot Church Of Rev.17:5 Is Coming Together

It is time we took a look at the World-wide Mega Church phenomenon. When Jesus walked the earth, God in the flesh, healing, raising the dead, preaching the word of God, laying the foundation of and building His church, there were no Mega churches. The church of Jesus Christ has never been approved of or accepted by the masses. Even after Jesus had ministered truth in this world for three and a half years, resurrected and ascended into heaven, and over 500 people saw him, yet, there were only 120 followers who immediately gathered to pray in the upper room. (Acts 1:15). Mega churches have never existed until these latter days.

Then after His ascension, when He sent his Holy Spirit into believers, in the book of Acts, when 3000 were saved and baptized, they returned, from the Passover celebration, to their own cities and countries to serve the Lord there and probably started churches, but none became Mega churches. Neither did the Apostles of Jesus build any Mega churches. 

The following video is long and strong and not for everyone. Many professing Christians are already part of the modern glamour churches, on the broad road of Apostasy, and will be offended by this YouTube video. Others have no interest or knowledge of spiritual things and will also take that same "broad way" to destruction. But some of you will see the truth and recognize the problem. The video is not opposed to churches because they are large, but the so called Mega churches, those which have abandoned the narrow way of truth for the broad way of error, simply to attract and draw in great numbers of followers and money, and power.... That is heresy.
"But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed" Gal.1:8.

Jesus, who led His Apostles and disciples in the single narrow way of truth, knew all of the other ways Satan would devise, including many different  worldly ways and "religious" ways. All of these other ways, Jesus called the "broad way" of error that leads to destruction. Here is how Jesus instructed his followers, in Matt.7:13-15, to follow Him....
"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves."

Here is the "broad way" Satan is using, as a wedge, or point of the spear, to divide professing Christians, the spiritually anemic from the spiritually healthy, to unite in a world-wide harlot "religion"(false church), together with the unsaved masses, in a global preparation for the Antichrist's rule. One world, one government, one church ... the harlot church of the Revelation 17:5.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn-9qVw2Jck

Our Own Homegrown Muslim Imam Linked To Orlando Terror Speaks In Defense Of Islam

So here's a Muslim Imam, in the U.S., interviewed by Fox News' Greta Van Susteren. He knows every word he says will be read and reread, scrutinized, analyzed and interpreted by many thousands of Americans, to understand what he really believes as a Muslim expert. Anyone in that position would be trying not to say anything that would throw a bad light or negative connotation on his religion, especially so soon after one of his own fellow Muslims just slaughtered or wounded 100 Americans. So he is trying  his best to show he is harmless and reasonable and a good guy and that Islam is indeed a peaceful religion. But as hard as he tries to give a good impression, the true nature of Islam foams out of his tight lips like nitric acid dribbling down his chin. Kind of like the alligator at Disney World, in Orlando this week, who was maintaining a low profile, his eyes just above the water, barely breathing "rock-a-by-baby" as he gently glided toward the innocent infant on shore. He too was trying not to look his true self but just a pretty little ripple in the water. Well, Mr. Alligator Imam, ignorant Arabs born into Islam, in the Middle East may have a feeble excuse for their asinine treatment of women, sexual abuse of young boys and maiming of young girls, stoning rape victims, higher taxes on non-Muslims, and exporting terrorism around the world, but you, Imam Gator, started out as Marcus Robertson, an American and have no excuse except your deeply ingrained stupidity and hatred of your home country. RB



This from Western Press by Jack Davis

Imam Linked To Orlando Shooter Stuns With Statements On Beheading Journalists, Stoning Women

“I do not condemn that." Imam Abu Taubah

Imam Abu Taubah, who was questioned by authorities in relation to Orlando, Florida, gunman Omar Mateen, told Fox News host Greta Van Susteren that he supported beheading journalists, but later added that he made the remark “facetiously.”

Taubah said it is not America’s business when American reporters, such as James Foley, are beheaded in the Middle East.

“I believe some journalists need to be beheaded,” he said, “but I wouldn’t have done that.”

Van Susteren replied, “How can you in any way justify ISIS beheading …”

“I’m not justifying it,” Taubau said, adding, “Don’t we have our own problems here? Is it our business?”

The imam denied reports that Mateen had been a student of his online Muslim seminary, and sought to distance himself from the man who murdered 49 people Sunday.

“I disavow the concept of anyone taking the law into their own hand … no one can justify that with Islam,” he said.

During the interview, Taubah, formerly known as Marcus Robertson, said he would not condemn stoning women who commit adultery.

“I do not condemn that. Do you condemn someone getting the electric chair for whatever crime they get the electric chair for?” he said.

“So you think adultery for a woman is a death penalty offense?” Van Susteren then asked.

"It is kind of like getting people to do crimes and hurt other people. That’s not good for the country.” Abu said.

His objection to Clinton was based on her gender. “As a Muslim I object to Hillary Clinton “Why you want to specify a woman?” Taubah later said.

“Because I see the women stoned to death and I don’t see the men,” Van Susteren shot back. “Are they stoning the men to death? Are they?”

Taubah called Van Susteren’s questions “unfair.”

During the interview, he was asked about the two leading presidential candidates — Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton.

“I don’t like either one,” Robertson replied, adding, “Trump plays too much to ignorance and,” he said. “I don’t believe a woman should be the president of a nation. As our prophet … taught us, whenever a woman is in charge there’s going to be problems. What if she’s on her menses and it’s time to go to war, is she going to press the button because she’s angry?”

_____________________________________

And this from
The Washington Free Beacon dated June 17,1016

Homeland Security Report Calls for Rejecting Terms ‘Jihad,’ Sharia’

A new Department of Homeland Security report urges rejecting use of Islamic terms such as “jihad” and “sharia” in programs aimed at countering terrorist radicalization among American youth.

The Probable Unintended Consequences Of Another Third Party Candidate

"Good Intentions" Is Not A Strategy

A Third Party, Presidential Candidate now being considered by establishment Republicans, some Evangelicals and Conservative Independents, is a desperate move to provide a Candidate who doesn't have the huge disapproval ratings, in the polls, as Trump, Clinton and Sanders. The last really big Third Party attempt we had was Perot against Bush #1 and Bill Clinton. Clinton won it with 43% of the popular vote due to the entry of Perot.

Popular vote in 1992 Presidential Race which got us Clinton.

Bill Clinton - 44,909,806 - 43.0% - Democrat

H.W. Bush - 39,104,550 -  37.4% - Republican

Ross Perot  - 19,743,821 - 18.9% - Independent

All other candidates combined only got 00.7%


In the Presidential Election of 1992, Third Party Conservative, Candidate Ross Perot, in his effort to keep the office from Socialist, Liberal Bill Clinton or Semi-Conservative H.W. Bush, unintentionally gave the Presidency to Bill Clinton by dividing the Republican, and Conservative Independent votes, between himself and Bush. Had he not run, almost all of those who voted for Perot, because he was more Conservative than Bush, would have voted for Bush not Clinton. Though I, personally, liked Perot's stand better than the first Bush, I voted for Bush to avoid Liberal Socialist Clinton winning. If Perot had not been in the race, Bush would have won more electoral votes, by far, with somewhere close to 55% of the popular vote, the Clinton machine would have died and we would not be facing Hillary, who is worse than her Bill, today.

As much as I dislike Donald Trump's narcissistic, in your face boasting, I would far rather have him than Hillary's habitual lying, Socialism and ineptness in everything she has ever been involved in .... or Bernie Sanders the flaming Socialist who may actually be a closet Communist. Trump would be much preferable to either of the Democrats.

What very well may happen is that Hillary will be charged with serious crimes and forced to drop out of the race, which would pit Bernie Sanders against Trump and the Third Party Conservative Candidate. I don't think the Democrats would split their party by choosing Biden over Sanders at their convention... but they may. They are, after all, the real Socialist Party in America, but won't admit it. In that scenario, both Trump and Sanders, who have high "negative" disapproval ratings in the polls, and the Third Party Candidate, would probably each get near a third of the popular vote.  In which case the big city states, with large Socialistic welfare populations and the most electoral votes as well, may just give us a self-confessed Socialist as President.  But, who knows, we may wind up with a three party system and someone other than a Democrat or Republican President.

Actually, there is already a Third Party Candidate other than the one I speak of above. It is the Libertarian Party Candidate, Gary Johnson, former Governor of New Mexico, who is involved in and a proponent of legalized Marijuana as well as, in general, live and let live, let everyone do whatever they choose to do, reduce the military, and stay out of foreign affairs. He already has 10% of the popular vote in two polls, but draws his support about equally between Democrat and Republican.

One thing is sure. "Hope" will not determine the outcome of the Presidential election ... Prayer may ... But why should God help us out of this mess when there seems to be no real repentance and turning to God in America? We may just get what we deserve .... which is frightening. The question is ... "Who is the most frightening?"

Would This Human/Beast Be A Biblical Human, Animal, Or Something More Sinister?

Stranger by far than fiction ... where could it lead?
Using God created DNA to make a humanimal perversion ???

In Search For Cures, Scientists Create Embryos That Are Both Animal And Human
Heard on NPR All Things Considered 
By Bob Stein

A handful of scientists around the United States are trying to do something that some people find disturbing: make embryos that are part human, part animal.

The researchers hope these embryos, known as chimeras, could eventually help save the lives of people with a wide range of diseases.

One way would be to use chimera embryos to create better animal models to study how human diseases happen and how they progress.

Perhaps the boldest hope is to create farm animals that have human organs that could be transplanted into terminally ill patients.

But some scientists and bioethicists worry the creation of these interspecies embryos crosses the line. "You're getting into unsettling ground that I think is damaging to our sense of humanity," says Stuart Newman, a professor of cell biology and anatomy at the New York Medical College.

The experiments are so sensitive that the National Institutes of Health has imposed a moratorium on funding them while officials explore the ethical issues they raise.

Nevertheless, a small number of researchers are pursuing the work with alternative funding. They hope the results will persuade the NIH to lift the moratorium.

"We're not trying to make a chimera just because we want to see some kind of monstrous creature," says Pablo Ross, a reproductive biologist at the University of California, Davis. "We're doing this for a biomedical purpose."

The NIH is expected to announce soon how it plans to handle requests for funding.

Recently, Ross agreed to let me visit his lab for an unusual look at his research. During the visit, Ross demonstrated how he is trying to create a pancreas that theoretically could be transplanted into a patient with diabetes.

The first step involves using new gene-editing techniques to remove the gene that pig embryos need to make a pancreas.

Working under an elaborate microscope, Ross makes a small hole in the embryo's outer membrane with a laser. Next, he injects a molecule synthesized in the laboratory to home in on and delete the pancreas gene inside. (In separate experiments, he has done this to sheep embryos, too.)

After the embryos have had their DNA edited this way, Ross creates another hole in the membrane so he can inject human induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS for short, into the pig embryos.

Like human embryonic stem cells, iPS cells can turn into any kind of cell or tissue in the body. The researchers' hope is that the human stem cells will take advantage of the void in the embryo to start forming a human pancreas.

Because iPS cells can be made from any adult's skin cells, any organs they form would match the patient who needs the transplant, vastly reducing the risk that the body would reject the new organ.

But for the embryo to develop and produce an organ, Ross has to put the chimera embryos into the wombs of adult pigs. That involves a surgical procedure, which is performed in a large operating room across the street from Ross's lab.

Ross then rushed over with a special syringe filled with chimera embryos. He injected 25 embryos into each side of the animal's uterus. The procedure took about an hour. He repeated the process on a second pig.

Every time Ross does this, he then waits a few weeks to allow the embryos to develop to their 28th day — a time when primitive structures such as organs start to form.

Ross then retrieves the chimeric embryos to dissect them so he can see what the human stem cells are doing inside. He examines whether the human stem cells have started to form a pancreas, and whether they have begun making any other types of tissues.

The uncertainty is part of what makes the work so controversial. Ross and other scientists conducting these experiments can't know exactly where the human stem cells will go. Ross hopes they'll only grow a human pancreas. But they could go elsewhere, such as to the brain.

"If you have pigs with partly human brains you would have animals that might actually have consciousness like a human," Newman says. "It might have human-type needs. We don't really know."

That possibility raises new questions about the morality of using the animals for experimentation. Another concern is that the stem cells could form human sperm and human eggs in the chimeras.

"If a male chimeric pig mated with a female chimeric pig, the result could be a human fetus developing in the uterus of that female chimera," Newman says. Another possibility is the animals could give birth to some kind of part-human, part-pig creature.

"One of the concerns that a lot of people have is that there's something sacrosanct about what it means to be human expressed in our DNA," says Jason Robert, a bioethicist at Arizona State University. "And that by inserting that into other animals and giving those other animals potentially some of the capacities of humans that this could be a kind of violation — a kind of, maybe, even a playing God."

Ross defends what his work doesa. "I don't consider that we're playing God or even close to that," Ross says. "We're just trying to use the technologies that we have developed to improve peoples' life."

Still, Ross acknowledges the concerns. So he's moving very carefully, he says. For example, he's only letting the chimera embryos develop for 28 days. At that point, he removes the embryos and dissects them.

If he discovers the stem cells are going to the wrong places in the embryos, he says he can take steps to stop that from happening. In addition, he'd make sure adult chimeras are never allowed to mate, he says.

"We're very aware and sensitive to the ethical concerns," he says. "One of the reasons we're doing this research the way we're doing it is because we want to provide scientific information to inform those concerns."

Ross is working with Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte from the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., and Hiromitsu Nakauchi at Stanford University. Daniel Garry of the University of Minnesota and colleagues are conducting similar work. The research is funded in part by the Defense Department and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM).
________________________________

Here are the Bible references to the 666 "Beast" in The Revelation...

11:7 - 13:1,4,17,18 - 14:3,11 - 15:2,7 - 16:2,10,13 -
17:3,7,8,11,12 - 18:13 - 19:4,19,20 - 20:4.10

There Is Something Hillary Needs Worse Than The Presidency

She is a tormented woman and winning will not help her or us

Common Sense Commentary: There may not be another couple in America who have the ambitious, all in, irrepressible drive, for power, wealth, and recognition as these two old hippies, Hillary and Bill Clinton. Their entire lives, from youth, have run from one extreme, of hatred for American Free Enterprise, the Rich, the Military, and the Constitution to the other extreme, with age, morphing into the very things they hated. Today they using these very same objects of their original hatred to gain and keep power, control and wealth. In their transformation they have left a miles wide path of human and national wreckage, death, corruption and disgrace equal to a mammoth, amoral, Arkansas tornado. Lust may have destroyed Bill's soul, but power and bitter meanness has destroyed Hillary's and may finish off America. So what can America give Hillary instead of the Presidency?

This from Political Insider News

Doctor Just Exposed Hillary 
Clinton’s HEALTH SECRET!





Hillary Clinton’s failing health has been speculated about for years. But now that she’s on the campaign trail, people are starting to ask major questions.

A Critical Care Nurse has written that there is plenty to question about the 68-year old Hillary Clinton. Something isn’t right .... her medical records are outdated and someone is covering up major problems.

Supposedly, she only suffers from blood clots, as Dr. Drew Pinsky reported:
"She’s had twice a clot in her leg – these are serious clots that lead to something called pulmonary embolism, which can also cause sudden death. So, she has an underlying recurrent blood clot in her leg, a clot in her transverse sinus…why is she clotting?” he asked Via Mad World

The problem here is, why is Hillary Clinton taking an “anticoagulant” (a blood thinner) called Coumadin for her clots from years ago… when there’s supposedly no underlying condition currently? It typically isn’t used for more than 2 months, which is a clear sign that something else is wrong.

Hillary has to be monitored closely, as the medicine insures she can bleed under the skin easily by bumping into things. A car accident could mean bleeding to death, as blood clots would not properly form.

As Dr. Drew noted:
“And then why would you leave her on the oldest and sort of most treacherous anticoagulant? If you’re going to leave somebody on an anticoagulant, why the oldest, old fashion anticoagulant … Wouldn’t you think somebody who’s a candidate for president (would) have one of the newer anticoagulants that are safer?” At that age, clots can lead to pulmonary embolism (clot traveling to the lungs)… which damages the lungs or other organs. It could also cause a stroke and kill.

Don’t forget even her closest advisor Huma Abedin has admitted on State Department emails that Hillary is sick and “often confused.” And Matt Drudge has noted Hillary Clinton’s possible use of a “walker” during magazine photo shoots.

Considering that being President is perhaps the most difficult job in the world, shouldn’t the American people know what type of health problems Hillary Clinton is hiding from us? There is a massive coverup going on about Hillary Clinton’s failing health, and that’s why doctors are noticing.

_________________________

My Common Sense Comment is ...
What we, as Americans, need to do for Hillary Clinton is not to elect her as President but pray for her health, her mean bitterness, her husband and God's mercy for both of their eternal souls.  Yes, pray for Hillary's conversion. RB

Before You Turn The Hen House Over To The Fox, Remember Her Record

And this is just the feathers and egg shells of her past.

When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform.  Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress.  This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration.  Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my worst mistake.”  Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.

Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission.  Lani Guanier was her selection.  When a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations.  She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department.  Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security.  When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House.  Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.

Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense.  Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle were:

She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit.  After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones she refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor.  After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs. Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practise law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.

After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.

Maybe worst of all was her dereliction of duty and responsibility in the deaths of our Ambassador and his protectors in Benghazi, as well as years of bad judgment, damaging decisions and our loss of global respect, while she was Secretary of State.

What a swell party – ready for another four or eight year of this type low-life mess? Now we are exposed to her destruction of incriminating emails and mishandling of national security information while she was Secretary of State. Not to mention the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation. You have to wonder what shoe will fall next.  But to her loyal fans - “what difference does it make?”

Electing Hillary Clinton president would be like granting Satan absolution and giving him the keys to heaven!

And just think, since leaving the White House, the Clinton's, through 2014, had made $221,139,576.00 and BOTH are now drawing huge taxpayer funded U. S. Government pensions, with superb medical care and 24 hour Secret Service protection for life.